Is it just me, or has toplinked been around for a while now without ever offering to share the revenue by "monetizing your network" up until coincidentally at the same time they came up with this new amazing concept of 'sharing', they managed to get a copycat at exactly the same time...? how odd, wouldn't you think?
Now what would happen if toplinked just did business as usual and someone actually took their model and improved it to share with others, without toplinked doing anything different than what they've been doing for years now. I don't suppose that would make toplinked look pretty in front of their members.
I think the above just proves that 'the best defense is a good offense' for toplinked. I think this 'horrible' Victoria person seems to be pretty good in this social networking space, and inevitably there would be people/entities that would go into life preservation mode to survive a natural evolution process. just my 2 cents.

LinkedIn Jury

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

FEATURES:

SECTIONS:

WE READ:

"Peopletoucher.com" and the Peopletoucher pointed hand logo are trademarks of NodeReach, LLC. © 2009
All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
Peopletoucher.com™ is an independent weblog unaffiliated with any professional networking sites.